How the comparison was built
The comparison is built on practising-counsel data: actual application timelines from filed engagements, regulator-fee invoices, capital lock-up amounts, and post-licence supervision burden in years one and two. Where official sources publish data, we link to them with rel="nofollow"; where data comes from practice, the line is annotated.
Featured jurisdictions
- Estonia
- Lithuania
- Costa Rica
Frequently asked questions
Which is the ready-made crypto license for sale?
Ready-made crypto licences are pre-incorporated, pre-authorised companies sold as a single transaction. They are legitimate when the regulator allows change-of-control without a fresh fit-and-proper review — and a serious risk when they do not.
Why these jurisdictions?
Each of the featured jurisdictions has been ranked on a composite of regulator credibility, capital, timeline, banking access and ongoing supervision burden. Estonia, Lithuania, Costa Rica lead the ranking.
How recent is this comparison?
We refresh comparison pages quarterly. Capital figures, timelines and regulator approaches move year on year — see the ‟last updated” line at the bottom of each page.
Can you produce a custom comparison for my project?
Yes. Send a short brief on the model, target customers and capital. We come back with a tailored shortlist within 24 hours — no obligation.
Last updated: 2026-04. Refreshed quarterly.